CITIZEN PEROT: His
Life and Times (Random House, 1996) was excerpted in Time magazine and
critically acknowledged as the definitive biography of Texas billionaire Ross Perot.
"Brilliant" - Business Week. "Engrossing" - Philadelphia
Inquirer. "Juicy" - Boston Globe. "Fascinating" - New
York Daily News. The book was one of the most controversial books of the 1996
political campaign, and has been optioned for a television film.
His Life and Times
FROM THE BOOK'S FLAP COPY:
Ross
Perot, for all that has been said and written about him, remains something of an enigma.
The images presented of his life are often in conflict. Is he a heroic businessman who
risked his life to rescue two of his kidnapped workers from revolutionary Iran, or a
callous executive who ran roughshod over his employees and investigated the company's
senior officers? A brilliant strategist who built a multibillion-dollar empire with an
innovative idea in computers, or someone cunning enough to take advantage of government
programs and milk an unfair profit? A super patriot who underwrote his own missions to
Southeast Asia to help the plight of the POWs and MIAs, or a secretive billionaire who was
engrossed in far-flung conspiracy theories about the CIA and the international narcotics
trade?
The result of two years of meticulous research, and based on hundreds of new interviews
and documents Citizen Perot strips away the mythology and unmasks the real Ross
Perot for the first time. This groundbreaking book discloses the inside story of how Perot
made his fortune; uncovers the tremendous influence he wielded with different presidents;
presents the complete saga of his rescue mission from Iran; exposes the private wars he
waged against government officials and business competitors he considered corrupt;
explains the secret battles that created animosity with George Bush; and, finally, reveals
what was behind Perot's unusual charges of Republican dirty tricks in the 1992 campaign.
At the heart of this investigation is Perot himself. Based in part on Perot's own
unprecedented cooperation with author Gerald Posner, this book narrates a life that is
rich in detail and unique for what it has attempted and accomplished. Studying Perot from
his childhood to his current effort to create a third political party, Posner delivers an
exhaustive inspection that cuts through years of misinformation and distortions to lay
bare Perot's accumulation and use of power. In the process, it answers the perplexing
question of what motivates Perot. It also shows whether he has the temperament and
personality to be an effective president. Citizen Perot is an absorbing examination
of a man who has become an American icon.
Enter the Professionals
When a decision was made to hire professionals, Perot's inner circle
was initially inclined to hire only Hamilton Jordan, the Democratic consultant, who had
attended some strategy sessions during April. Although Luce and Meyerson liked the
forty-seven-year-old Jordan, they were not certain he was the right choice on his own,
since he had been out of politics and had not run a campaign in twelve years. By mid-May,
as Perot's poll numbers skyrocketed, Meyerson began actively pushing for balance by hiring
a Republican consultant to work with Jordan. "I thought that if we went with only one
or the other," recalls Meyerson, "we would have been labeled as Democrat or
Republican, and I thought the only way to avoid that was to hire one from each
party." Soon the Republican list narrowed to forty-nine-year-old Ed Rollins, who was
credited with Ronald Reagan's successful reelection effort.
Jim Squires, however, argued against hiring Rollins. "I told Mort and Tom that Eddie
is the antithesis of Perot," says Squires. "He is all professional, he is
big-time, he loves the press, is a spin guy, and Perot is an anti-spin guy. So its like
mixing oil and water. I think he is very smart, and he is well connected, but he is not
for Perot. He was the worst choice. Fellows like Eddie are really out to convince the
press how smart they are. They take credit for everything. What you needed with Perot were
a bunch of self-effacing anonymous guys who wouldn't take credit for anything, who would
hide in the woodwork and do what they could do. And Rollins was just the opposite."
Luce also had mixed feelings about Rollins. "I was concerned about him being a leaker
and about his judgment," he says. "Early on, I read where Ed Rollins said he
turned down a million-dollar offer to be campaign manager for Ross Perot. That was before
I ever met with him."
Meyerson, however, was a strong Rollins booster. "I had met both Rollins and Jordan
and was quite impressed with both," he recalls. His argument that both were necessary
to give the campaign balance prevailed. When Luce and Meyerson presented their decision to
Perot, he agreed. "They [Luce and Meyerson] were two people I knew, that I
trusted," says Perot, "and I was busy on the road, so I left it up to
them."
Jordan was anxious to join the campaign. Yet, just as the Perot team was divided on
Rollins, so Rollins himself had not made up his own mind as to whether he would accept the
offer. His wife, Sherrie, was in the Bush White House as one of eight presidential aides,
and he feared that if he worked for Perot he could lose substantial Republican business in
the future. But after several weeks of being courted by Meyerson and Luce, Rollins was
inclined to accept. On Memorial Day weekend, Rollins joined Luce and Meyerson for a
conference at Jordan's office in Nashville. There, the two professionals divided their
campaign responsibilities.
"We had each managed campaigns and knew you couldn't run it by committee,"
recalls Rollins. "So I said, 'I am happy to let you manage it if you want to, or I
will manage it.' Ham said, 'I am not current, I haven't run a campaign in twelve years.
You know the game, you know the players, you are better equipped to do it.' There was no
power struggle."
Neither Jordan nor Rollins had yet met Perot. Both agreed to fly to Dallas the following
weekend to make sure the chemistry was right. Before that happened, on May 28 a story
broke in The Wall Street Journal that scooped the Perot campaigns announcement about the
hiring. Rollins, by his own admission, was the source for the story. Perot was furious,
since if there was one thing he could not tolerate, it was leaking information to the
press. He wanted to cancel the meeting with Rollins, but Jordan spoke to Rollins, who
apologized and said it would not happen again. Perot was temporarily placated.
Before meeting Perot, Rollins and Jordan again met with Luce and Meyerson. There,
according to Rollins, "we told them a final time what we needed to do to run a
modern-day campaign. They didn't have a primary, they didn't have a political party, so to
make up the difference, we talked in the neighborhood of a $150 million budget. It was
important that they begin an advertising campaign in June or July, and run it through the
summer, to define him, since no one knew who he was. The potential with Perot was real,
and the potential to win, given the unique set of circumstances in 1992, was very real. We
were both very insistent that we did not want to be part of anything less than that,
because it just wouldn't work."
However, Luce and Meyerson deny that Rollins or Jordan ever mentioned such a large sum.
"Neither mentioned $150 million, never," Luce says. "No way. That statement
is not true. If it had been mentioned, it would not have stopped the conversation, but I
would have remembered it, and I would have thought that was crazy. Ross Perot didn't get
to be a billionaire by giving people blank checks."
Instead, Meyerson and Luce tried to impress on the two professionals that they needed
advice on how to run an unconventional campaign. Luce remembers saying, "You must
understand that this will be an entirely different presidential campaign than has ever
been run, and if you think you are going to prepare cue cards for Ross Perot, forget
it."
Rollins and Jordan wondered whether Perot might still veto their hiring the next day. Yet,
when they finally met for five hours, Perot was gracious and likable. "He was in his
sales mode. He agreed to everything," Rollins remembers. "We put the $150
million figure on the table. 'I will spend whatever it takes,' Perot said. 'I have never
swam halfway across the river.' He said all the right things."
Rollins was impressed by Perot. "There was a Reagan quality to him and a Nixon
quality to him, the two presidents I had worked for. The Reaganesque quality was when he
spoke of Americana and POWs. He started telling some of his great stories about these
POWs, and he had obviously done some wonderful things. The Nixon part was the paranoia,
the sort of 'They are out to get me.' I can't tell you precisely what it was, but there
were little things that warned me even then about his paranoia this whole thing, 'The
Republicans are out to get me, the opposition research,' and all this horseshit. Then we
spent some time talking about my wife [a Bush aide]; he was very concerned about
that".
Perot also said several things that led Rollins to believe that Perot had had him
investigated prior to the meeting. "He talked about my health, and no one really knew
much about my health," says Rollins. "I had a stroke in 1982. He talked about my
first marriage, and said, 'You've already had one failed marriage; we wouldn't want you to
damage this one.' No one, anywhere, knew about my first marriage. It happened before I
came to Washington, it wasn't in the clips, you would just never have found it in the
Lexis/Nexis clips. No one thought of me as someone divorced."
But Perot told Rollins and Jordan they could run a campaign that might change political
history. They left feeling comfortable with their decision to come aboard. They were not
aware that Perot was not especially impressed with either of them. Less than a week later,
Rollins further dampened any enthusiasm Perot may have had when he appeared on a Sunday
morning television show talking about his new job. "He didn't clear that with Perot
first," says Jim Squires, "and Perot was on the phone chewing him out and
critiquing his performance immediately. And he said something on TV that got Jesse Jackson
all riled up, and Jesse was calling Perot. Perot was all out of joint."
"Rollins ignored direct instructions," says Luce. "He had agreed not to go
on television. Then he goes right on and purports to speak for Ross Perot. Ross said, 'I
am not going to have Rollins speak for me when he doesn't know me from Adam. He doesn't
know what I think. He doesn't know what I say.' Rollins's first strike was the Wall Street
Journal article, strike two was that he went right back on television after we had gone
through this with him again, and strike three was Jesse Jackson."
It almost made Perot feel that he had made a mistake by agreeing to any professionals
coming aboard. "I should have said absolutely no [to their hiring]," he says.
"Within three days after he [Rollins] was on board, I felt it was a serious mistake
and wondered if he was really on board to represent me."
Back To Books Page
Home | Books | Articles | Gerald Posner | News and Updates | Contact Us
Copyright Gerald Posner 1996